{"id":67,"date":"2017-08-30T16:13:17","date_gmt":"2017-08-30T16:13:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/?page_id=67"},"modified":"2023-10-26T23:54:17","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T23:54:17","slug":"seeds-archive-2015-16","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/?page_id=67","title":{"rendered":"Seeds Archive 21-15"},"content":{"rendered":"

[The following Seeds…<\/em><\/strong>are currently being updated, including re-insertion of photos. They should be easier to read shortly.]<\/p>\n

Seeds of\u00a0<\/strong>Thought (#21):\u00a0All of the above–& then some
\n<\/b>Seeds of\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>Thought (#20):<\/em>\u00a0<\/b>The <\/strong><\/i>Trans-local Mind in Migration
\nSeeds of Thought (#19): Thinking like a planet
\n<\/b><\/i><\/strong>Seeds of Thought (#18):\u00a0A Net with Many Moving Centers<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/b>
\n<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n

Seeds of T<\/em>hought (#21)<\/em><\/strong>—All of the above–& then some (2016)<\/em><\/b><\/p>\n

The old advice \u201cthink globally, act locally<\/i>\u201d is incomplete without noting that neither thinking and acting, nor global and local, are necessarily separate from each other at all. Given the speed of modern communication, transport and transaction, such distinctions almost disappear\u2014but this shrinkage is only the surface of a deeper story.<\/p>\n

Terms like local, regional, <\/i>and global <\/i>represent concepts that are not just relative and subject to overlapping degrees, but reflect an underlying reality in which near and far are fundamentally entangled, mutually interpenetrating. Local expresses global, and vice versa. You don\u2019t have one without the other. Where is there air, water or sun that is only local, for example? Or wildlife, the human mind and culture? Each exists within and beyond definable boundaries, part of larger systems emerging from exchange.<\/p>\n

You might say local is wherever we are<\/i>, yet life itself is always in transit, even the most well rooted moving through time. We may zig and zag, individually and in groups, yet shared planetary motions are always with us, shaping our days and seasons. Here<\/i> itself is in motion. Conversely, even our own bodies have components from everywhere, as each cell, breath and swallow contains elements affected by wherever they\u2019ve been, as by the molecules they\u2019ve become part of.<\/p>\n

In the relation of parts and whole, parts derive substance, sustenance and significant characteristics from the shared whole, and vice versa. No parts thrive long without a healthy whole in which to be and become, drawing nourishment and renewal. No whole thrives long without a sufficiency of healthy parts working together at all scales\u2014itself also part of a greater whole. Social, cultural and physical health thus depend on ecological health, and vice versa, with infinitely looped connections.<\/p>\n

Land health can be described in many ways\u2014e.g., practically<\/i>, in terms of firewood, food, education, and other values produced, not all quantifiable; objectively<\/i>, using information on vegetation and wildlife, including changes in numbers, varieties, and other characteristics of resilience, the system\u2019s apparent capacity to sustain, re-balance and renew itself; and subjectively<\/i>, using aesthetic, psychological and spiritual terms like beauty, wonder and awe.<\/p>\n

At the intersection of\u00a0 natural and social fabrics, refuges help support healthy connections between near and far, as well as between human and wildlife communities. In this, they help shape, as well as reflect, deeper community values, working in a network of many related efforts at all levels of human organization\u2014individual home and biome to thoughtful earth as a whole, with many overlaps in between, wherever our activities interact with natural systems.<\/p>\n

Given the shared awareness at the core, it may seem self-evident which expressions have most importance: window-box gardens or wilderness protection; bird-friendly yards or wildlife-rich forests; productive farms and ranches or healthy rivers and wetlands; watershed alliances or conservation agencies; community services or public parks; school habitats or field-trips; local acts or national policies; cooperative planetary efforts addressing global issues over decades, or fleeting moments fluid on the wing when life speaks from the heart for itself.<\/p>\n

this is my world, too\u2014\/ the red-winged blackbird declares\/ again & again<\/i><\/p>\n

[Found at a Concert for the Birds silent auction some years ago, the full-throated photo above is unsigned, but seems to be by Amanda Ruffin.]<\/p>\n

Seeds of\u00a0<\/strong>Thought (#20)–The <\/strong><\/i>Trans-local Mind\u00a0in Migration (<\/i><\/strong><\/b>2015\/2016):<\/p>\n

Flocks passing south with the sun turn thoughts to being in more than one place and time. As with loss of youth or cherished companions, part of the departed remains, while parts of the remaining feel elsewhere. In contrast to the entanglement<\/i> described in physics, our connection may be psychological, yet the two realms aren\u2019t as separate as some assume, and the state of either affects the other.<\/p>\n

The idea of separateness <\/i>often unravels under close scrutiny. Even the self, that most distinct of ephemeral creatures, exists only by virtue of being in constant exchange with many worlds\u2014air, water, food, land, language, society, economy, and sun for openers. Our lives are woven from countless, often hidden, relationships at every scale, from biome and creatures on the wing to planetary currents and astronomical fields.<\/p>\n

To be fair, a sense of separateness is functional in everyday life, and many practical advantages come from applying it. The fact that the brick wall is mostly empty space on the atomic level doesn\u2019t change the fact that we don\u2019t want to run into it at the scale of our normal experience, only when visiting Alice in Wonderland.<\/p>\n

As the science most devoted to pure objectivity (i.e., separation of observer and world to the exclusion of psychological factors), physics was late to Alice\u2019s party, but has ended up there anyway with relativity<\/i>, uncertainty principle<\/i>, entanglement,<\/i> and non<\/i>–locality<\/i>. Some experts learn more & more about less & less by cutting things into smaller & smaller parts until nothing\u2019s left (though of that nothing, knowing little). When the physicist looks close, local<\/i> disappears into field, <\/i>while <\/i>particles become waves.<\/p>\n

The study of life has taken its own journey from entity to field, part to relationship. A half century before Einstein, Darwin could have called his great work a \u201ctheory of relativity.\u201d From detailed study of complex variations, he began to realize how bio-dynamically entangled living forms were with each other and with ecosystems through time\u2014with branching, non-linear feedback loops.<\/p>\n

A developing embryo, recapitulating the evolution of its life-form, may remind us how embedded the past remains in the present going forward, yet the legacies of life- and land-forms, language, culture and society are all around (and within) us, whether carried in DNA or other kinds of memory. The fabric of our organic relationships\u2014i.e., the web of life\u2014involves and transcends particular locations in space-time.<\/p>\n

Life is always in motion, singly and in flocks, bringing the far near and vice versa. Part goes wherever mind and heart range; parts of everywhere appear here\u2014from atoms created long ago in distant stars to the life-giving rays of the winter sun eight minutes away; the sustaining molecules in our next breath to that miraculous flock gliding in on ancient wings; the feelings of those near to thoughts from across the globe and\/or long ago.<\/p>\n

Even the seed, one of the most localized things we know, encapsulated in a shell-defined space (as if outside of time and apart from change), becomes the very vehicle of trans-locality<\/i>\u2014whether traveling through space in a bird\u2019s gut; across time, bringing its life-form to spring; or across forms, turning into the bird-in-migration!<\/p>\n

[Thanks to the web, a Seed of Thought<\/i> now also transcends its original place. For more on the trans-local relationships of place, time, seed, mind, migration and form, see links & articles to come. \u00a0\u2014RB]<\/p>\n

Follow-up\u00a0<\/strong>files to go up, below:<\/em>====================================<\/p>\n

(A)– Down the Fractal\u00a0Hole of the Trans-local Mind: <\/strong><\/em>on connectivity; the trans-locality of action & information; the mind in the non-machine….\u00a0[See “Down the Fractal Hole to the Trans-local Mind-pdf”]<\/p>\n

(B)–<\/strong> Degrees of non-separation:<\/strong><\/em> worm-holes, blind man’s hat, kneads & loops of matter & mind,\u00a0creatures of the in-between… [See “Degrees of non-separation”]<\/p>\n

(C)–Seeds of Paradox:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>more on the wonders of seeds in transition, evolution, time, memory, form & change… [See “The-Paradox-Seed-pdf]
\n=============================================<\/p>\n

Seeds of Thought (#19): Thinking like a planet (Sept. 2015)<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

All creatures, from single-cell organisms to birds and beyond, use languages distinctive to their kinds and groups. Human language may be considered our tool of tools<\/i>, shaping world and brain, making culture and technology possible. We use it to connect with others, process information, make sense of the world, work together, talk ourselves through any task, discover and clarify what we\u2019re thinking.<\/p>\n

Verbal language can be progressively fine-tuned to narrow the distance between reality and representation, our best remedy when focus is blurred by mis-<\/i>representation, whether deliberate or from ignorance. Since the gap between content and packaging makes it possible to call chemical off-gassing devices “air fresheners,” we modify how we interpret such information according to our sense of the transmitter\u2019s motives and level of understanding.<\/p>\n

Buckminster Fuller struggled to align his language and understanding. Training himself to observe, report, and relate to things as they were, he even replaced \u201csunrises\u201d and \u201csunsets\u201d with earth-turning equivalents. <\/i>This was during a period when government institutions were doing the opposite, i.e., generating \u201ccredibility gaps.\u201d Since language is a primary medium of connection, disconnecting it from what\u2019s really going on can have dangerous consequences, not the least of which can be loss of trust in both language and its users.<\/p>\n

If there’s an obligation in commerce to represent products accurately, it\u2019s all the stronger in science, where honest reporting provides the basis by which understanding advances, continually tweaking representations to better reflect the reality described. The better we understand, the better we frame; the better we frame, the better we understand. Aligning language and reality to each other sharpens focus the way some cameras bring two images together for precise registration.<\/p>\n

Applying this principle to the emergent ecological issues of our day, I\u2019m struck by how little meaning \u201cclimate change\u201d conveys on its own. When is climate not<\/i> changing? \u201cGlobal warming\u201d at least has a little content– though with dangerously misleading associations, being so tepid and even welcome when thermometers plunge. \u201cWarmth\u201d hardly does the dynamic justice. Put one hand in boiling water and freeze the other in ice; the average temperature isn\u2019t as alarming as the reality feels.<\/p>\n

I suggest “climate charging<\/i>” instead, for a more precise picture of what happens when accumulating \u201cgreenhouse gas\u201d molecules trap ever more solar radiation. This heat-energy charge translates into melting icecaps, rising seas, increased intensity of storms and range of extreme weather events, along with unknown ecological disruptions and an unclear potential for thermal runaway–or even an extreme reversal into a new ice age. Our fossil-fuel emissions take us into the uncharted territory of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels unprecedented in the lifetime of our species.<\/p>\n

Some effects may be welcome at times, as when rich summer rains charge a local ecosystem with green growth and birdsong, but the complexity of global feedback mechanisms requires us to gain control of otherwise runaway technologies while we can, a dangerously charged situation. Aldo Leopold once said the first rule of intelligent tinkering was \u201cto save the pieces,\u201d i.e., safe-guard critical systems from our own impact. Now that includes managing emissions at the planetary scale.<\/p>\n

With so much at stake, saying just charge it<\/i>, passing the charges on, isn\u2019t a responsible option. In Aldo\u2019s time, one might preserve or restore a forest, river or prairie patch by learning to think like a mountain, watershed, and land community. Now the challenge is learning to think like a planet.<\/i><\/p>\n

=====================================================<\/p>\n

A. More on #19:\u00a0<\/i><\/b>Climate CHARGING–<\/i>Changing Terms<\/b><\/p>\n

The term “Global Warming” supposedly gave way to “Climate Change” in part because it was too hard to explain how “warming” could also lead to colder colds. \u201cWarming,\u201d by itself, is at best incomplete, however, and at worst seriously misleading. Unfortunately, “change” by itself is relatively meaningless\u2014climate is always changing. The term communicates nothing about the nature of the change, its character, or its agencies.<\/p>\n

Another term suggested more recently has been “Climate Disruption.” Google it and many articles come up, including one from March 2015 in Forbes<\/i> on the history of (and reasons for) its use. Certainly it\u2019s the disruptive effects that concern us. It also implies that humans are doing the disrupting, which a main basis for human response.<\/p>\n

Ironically, one of the first terms used by scientists to describe the process and its potential implications was climate modification, <\/i>also focused on the role humans played. Otherwise, modification<\/i> is just a five-syllable substitute for change<\/i>. Neither provides any information about the nature of the changes\u2014except that modification <\/i>implies by us<\/i>.<\/p>\n

For reasons offered in Thinking like a planet<\/i>, above, I believe Climate <\/i>Charging<\/i><\/b> <\/i>gives a clearer, sharper and more informative picture.<\/i> Amazingly, a quick search of “climate charging<\/i><\/b>” produced no relevant links whatsoever! A deeper search might produce at least some results, as the term does occasionally slip into discussions, though not yet as a common name for the phenomenon discussed.<\/p>\n

Still, it goes right to the heart of what our activities are doing, rooted in fundamentals of the physical processes, the details of which are explained in various reliable websites, e.g., how electro-magnetic radiation from the sun gets turned into longer-wave heat-energy that greenhouse gas molecules absorb as extra vibration. Whether energy is conceptualized as heat or molecular motion, its charge<\/i> transfers throughout the system.<\/p>\n

A charged <\/i>system helps explain a wide range of effects, including the appearance of seemingly contradictory extremes, like severe cold waves and record snows in years when \u201caverage temperatures\u201d are hitting new highs. Events that seem to contradict \u2018global warming\u2019 become more understandable, part of a coherent picture that includes the intensity of storms, rising seas, and many effects as yet poorly understood. Many disruptions may be predicted, nevertheless.<\/p>\n

Some effects may even be quite welcome from the human perspective\u2014in some places at some times, or even on balance. It may be that the human presence makes the charging of planetary energies inevitable at a corresponding scale, but if so, this only reinforces our responsibility\u2014i.e., the necessity\u2014for us to regulate our outputs in the same way we do our other waste products.\u00a0Until we know how to manage the planet\u2019s thermostat responsibly, we better not be charging it to unprecedented levels in one direction without the ability to reverse course if & when we’ve gone too far….<\/p>\n

B. More on #19:<\/strong> Language–our tool of tools<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Part 1: [See “Language–ultimate tool.”]<\/p>\n

[More on \u201cclimate charging,\u201d “scale shifting,” & the relationship between language, awareness and reality may be added shortly.]<\/p>\n

=====================================================
\n=====================================================<\/p>\n

Seeds of Thought (#18): A Net with Many Moving Centers<\/strong>\u00a0(<\/em>June 2015)<\/p>\n

Asked if he had a last verse to leave behind at his journey\u2019s end, Basho said that for some time he\u2019d written each as his last. I\u2019ve tried to follow that example in \u201cSeeds,\u201d addressing the ecological idea or issue then most pressing. News of Jan Arrott\u2019s migration plans give rise to these thoughts now.<\/p>\n

Not long back, I couldn\u2019t have imagined a refuge friends group without her active presence as center of gravity, connecting wild and cultured worlds from her log nest at the refuge edge. Over the last dozen years, the group has become a resilient network, however, with members of different ages, skills and backgrounds drawn together by shared interests–including those that led to the establishment of the refuge fifty years ago. Both volunteer organization and refuge network have always been at heart community expressions.<\/p>\n

The network idea seems very current in this era of social networking and world-wide-web, yet it was already central to ecological perspectives long before, as students of nature became aware of complex living communities with countless, often hidden threads knitting the web of life<\/em> together. Not that ecologists were the first to adopt the metaphor.<\/p>\n

When the scribe copying Basho\u2019s Backcountry Trails<\/em> in 1694 claimed its maker was \u201clike that divine weaver whose every knot in the net of creation is a shining dew-drop jewel reflecting all,<\/em>\u201d he was alluding to what 3,000 year-old Sanskrit texts already called Indra\u2019s web<\/em>, a magical net in which each node contains an aspect of every other. Many cultures represent this connectedness interpenetrating all in similar ways\u2014with hoops, loops, nets, weavings and webs.<\/p>\n

Networking itself is far more ancient than any idea of it\u2014seemingly a core organizing principle of all advanced multi-celled organisms, families and social groups, yet practiced even by single-cell organisms. In \u201cquorum sensing,\u201d for example, members of certain bioluminescent species only light up when gathered in a large enough group. Recent discoveries show networking in other single cell critters also, practiced in somewhat different ways between cells just split off from each other, more distant cousins, and members of other species.<\/p>\n

I say \u201csingle-cell\u201d above, but the distinction between individual and community can be a matter of the scale on which one looks, i.e., in the eye of the beholder. Organisms don\u2019t live in a vacuum, but as part of communities with multiple relationships, languages and systems of exchange. As Aldo Leopold pointed out, what happens in one part of such an ecosystem affects all parts, according to connections often hidden in the rich complexity of the \u201cland organism.\u201d<\/p>\n

Whether units of a network are cells within an organism, ants in a colony, birds in a flock, or humans with a common purpose, many of the same dynamics apply. The individual unit is never fully \u201cbound\u201d within itself, but functions as part of larger wholes also. Whether called the land,<\/em> web of life<\/em>, nature,<\/em> living earth,\u00a0 flock<\/em>, or community<\/em>, these larger entities affect all their members, while each member affects the whole.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s been said that the universe surrounds us like a great circle with no boundary, whose center is everywhere. That can be said about networks also\u2014whether of refuges or of friends. One such center will travel wherever Jan moves, then, returning with her, too, making any special occasion that much more so. Meanwhile, the birds in Santa Fe are in for a treat.
\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<\/p>\n

Follow-ups to #18<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

“Ripples”:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>on\u00a0Basho’s last poems…
\n“Buds from the beginning<\/em><\/strong>“: on good will<\/em> & the difference one person can make–ask;
\n“The<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0universe<\/em>\u00a0as\u00a0<\/strong>a neural network with centers everywhere<\/em><\/strong>“: a runaway?<\/p>\n

Ripples: [See “Ripples from Basho”–&\/or\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>the \u00a0Hai! <\/em>page for more in the Basho vein, with lots more on Basho own work elsewhere.]<\/p>\n

Buds:<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 Recollections on early\u00a0FLVNWR history, plus reflections on Aldo, the nature of good will, caring & how synergy develops in networked systems–on request.<\/p>\n

The universe as a neural network with centers everywhere: <\/em><\/strong>In progress, but probably a runaway beyond the scope here, though maybe up eventually on the Going Deeper <\/em>page\u00a0<\/strong>(or sent as attachment on request<\/em>.<\/em>
\n=============================================<\/p>\n

[CUT: weaves a\u00a0personal tribute from\u00a0a few simple observations\u00a0&\u00a0a central idea with deep roots. There’s a follow-up on\u00a0Basho’s last poems (“Ripples”), following, with another in progress (“Buddies from the Beginning,” more on Jan, the early years of FLVNWR, &\u00a0the expanding universe as a neural network with its center everywhere). This picture of Jan\u00a0“in her natural habitat” is from a few years ago, when the Albuquerque F&WS office sent\u00a0its display trailer for the group to use at the county fair….]<\/p>\n

==========================================<\/p>\n

Seeds of Thought\u00a0<\/em>#17<\/strong>, below, came out March 2015.\u00a0The pink heads rising out of the snow (in the photo by Gita) are from a barrel cactus.\u00a0Seeds <\/em>#16 & #15 are further down the scroll, each with follow-ups not previously\u00a0published.\u00a0[Seeds<\/em> prior\u00a0to #15 (fall 2014) can be\u00a0found\u00a0on\u00a0Recent Seeds<\/em> & Seeds Archive <\/em>pages.]
\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
\nSeeds of Thought (#17): Spring all over again…<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Groundhog Day pops up roughly half-way between winter solstice and spring equinox, so calendars that regard solstices and equinoxes as seasonal mid-points locate the start of early spring and the new year near it, making it a time for beginning over with whatever added perspective prior experience may have provided. Like Bill Murray in the film \u201cGroundhog Day,\u201d we have a chance to pick up on repeated cues, hone intuitions, fine tune actions to outcomes\u2026.<\/p>\n

In that sense, each day the sun rises can be groundhog day– yesterday all over, yet open to fresh vision. Seasons repeat this process at another order of magnitude without ever being quite the same year by year or day by day, let alone over a lifetime. Each season surprises, but spring most of all (at the moment), as the power of life reasserts itself out of recently frozen ground. For new vegetation stirring in hidden root and seed, deeply encoded memories take nothing away from the fresh experience, as softened soil fluffed by frost records countless fresh prints, goose feet, paws, beetle tracks and more. For myself, with more than seventy springs under my belt, I\u2019m still surprised to be here at all, especially after a stretch of fierce winter storms and heart-chilling cold, thankful for wood-stored heat.<\/p>\n

No matter how many re-generations seeds and shoots spring from, their only real knowledge may be how to sprout and grow, following directions coded over eons. Wisdom, if any, must come from what\u2019s embedded by the larger whole over time, \u201cremembered\u201d in terms of how the self responds to what it finds, transforming molecules of air, water, and soil into its form(s). Seen in time-lapse photography, this transformation picks up speed when life stretches, breathes, feeds on and exchanges with the world that gives rise to and inhabits it. Though we try our best to anticipate what coming seasons have in store, our horizons, too, are limited.<\/p>\n

A century ago, in an age of rapid encyclopedia expansion, some supposedly learned people believed humans knew, or were on the verge of knowing, just about everything important. The ageless Socrates, on the other hand, attributed his vaunted wisdom to an acute awareness of how little he actually knew. He taught the wisdom of inquiry<\/em>, then, a way based on questioning, not presumption, as basic to the sciences as to philosophy. Like the child who follows each answer with another question, the student of nature finds new wonders to ponder with each discovery.<\/p>\n

Never mind for now exotic things like quantum weirdness. There\u2019s plenty to notice in what\u2019s close at hand wherever life is–bursting its shells, rearing its oogly heads, responding to changing conditions, changing forms with the seasons and stages of development. A taste of the wild in the life of the planet revives wonder breath by breath, as even the most familiar paths cast up fresh observations, birds, flights of thought, and signs of the time (moment, day, season, life).<\/p>\n

A cure for taking things too much for granted can be as simple as paying fresh attention; for a blind-spot, changing the angle of view; for incomplete understanding, another round of contemplation, step by step. For human folly (and the despairs thereof), at least there\u2019s the tonic of spring– <\/em>whose countless harbingers around here include robin, finch and meadowlark, mountain bluebird, beaver, bear and bud, whether critters in migration or year round residents.<\/p>\n

Just don\u2019t try to read the future in groundhog day shadows, as our local weather is rarely a question of either<\/em> early spring or six more weeks of winter. Usually, it\u2019s both, <\/em>e.g., more than 70\u00b0 yesterday (February 7), with snowstorms likely in months to come–with just enough d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu <\/em>to shed light on the general direction.
\n————————————————————————————————-<\/p>\n

After-thought #A: <\/em><\/strong>For more on time & calendars, click here:
\n~~~See ”\u00a0Time & Basho’s calendar”\u00a0(2 pp.).<\/p>\n

Part of an chapter\u00a0on the joys of translating the 17th Century traveling poet Matsuo Basho, “Time & Basho’s calendar” aims to\u00a0put the reader back in synch with the seasonal and planetary cycles.<\/p>\n

It suggests\u00a0how the more arbitrary calendar more widely used today,\u00a0disconnected from\u00a0natural time\u00a0cycles, makes renewal of fundamental relations with\u00a0nature all the more important.<\/p>\n

At least so I thought I heard Ranger Beaver expound,\u00a0explaining why one should never rely on a single groundhog shadow for weather predictions, especially as mis-translated & mis-interpreted by the\u00a0conventional media hype from Phil’s\u00a0“handlers.” The film “Groundhog Day” (written by Danny Rubin, from\u00a0Santa Fe at one time) is much more profound\u00a0than the media event being covered.\u00a0As Murray’s reporter-character\u00a0develops awareness of self & others through repeated\u00a0“re-awakenings,” each old-new day becomes an opportunity to fine-tune\u00a0attention, actions, and relationships.<\/p>\n

After-thought #B:\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>The Ecology of Pondering\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>(in progress)<\/p>\n

Aldo Leopold was a great ponderer\u2014easily intrigued, not so easily satisfied with superficial answers. His persistence in following things to deeper levels, more complete conclusions & more comprehensive understanding made him not just a great ecologist and teacher of wildlife science, but one of the great whole-system thinkers <\/em>of all time.<\/p>\n

I was thinking specifically of him\u2014along with Estella & each of their 5 offspring\u2014in \u201cSpring all over again\u201d when mentioning the wise child following each answer with more questions. I recalled a time about a century ago when Aldo was working on grazing issues out of the Forest Service\u2019s district office in Albuquerque. Some ranchers with an unusually high incidence of cow miscarriages asked for help.<\/p>\n

Leopold soon determined that the immediate problem was apparently caused by these cows eating too many green pine-tips–dropped to the ground by a population explosion of squirrels. Many experts would have gotten just this far (miscarriages to pine tips to squirrels), concluding that too many squirrels were the \u201ccause,\u201d so\u00a0reducing the squirrel population was the solution\u2014thus, traps, \u00a0poisons & shooting, for example.<\/p>\n

Leopold, with his\u00a0sense of more complete, eco-logical <\/em>systems, realized that intelligent response <\/em>meant first\u00a0knowing why the squirrel population had gotten out of\u00a0balance. With a little digging, he found that these same ranchers with\u00a0the troubled\u00a0cows had been shooting the hawks! The best solution\u2014cheapest & most effective longer term, with fewest negative side effects\u2014was\u00a0as simple as stop shooting the hawks. <\/em><\/p>\n

It was cultural, not technological, in other words. In fact, the technological proposals (traps, poisons, fire-power) were all bound to compound\u00a0imbalances over the longer term, not cure them. Did you get that? The foundation of the system the ranchers were drawing on was organic & ecological,\u00a0<\/em>not technological. Technology may play a supportive role, but the health of the organic system is what counts most.<\/p>\n

For an actual remedy or longer term cure, one needs to get not just to the first possible symptomatic intervention (e.g., squirrel numbers), but to the actual source of the imbalance<\/em> itself, particularly where human actions are\u00a0involved, as here, the ultimate cause that needs the\u00a0changing, if for no other reason than self-interest.<\/p>\n

Over some decades he came to realize a similar economics prevailed in the case of other predators for which some with shorter-term perspective maintained an active trigger itch. It turned out the value these brought to the health of the productive systems as a whole far, far out-weighed the small cost from domestic predation, yet\u00a0the values of informed management were all-too-often \u201cblindly sacrificed\u201d by those who saw only the most superficial aspects of short-term economics, itself\u00a0often\u00a0out of balance in similar ways.<\/p>\n

A funny thing about good will, meanwhile\u2014wherever it seems to be directed, it tends to benefit all<\/em>. In the example here, it can start out as good will for cows, ranchers, trees, squirrels, hawks,\u00a0wildlife in general, or even oneself, yet end up of benefit to the whole system that nourishes them all, not one part of the system at the expense of the others.<\/p>\n

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~###~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

================================================<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Here’s\u00a0the\u00a0column\u00a0from\u00a0the December 2014 issue,\u00a0with two follow-ups.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Seeds of Thought (#16):<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0Interplay<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

In an on-line game design course from MIT, a class member recently indicated an interest in \u201chelping people connect with nature.\u201d A working group was formed to experiment with possibilities. Of the two sometimes overlapping kinds of nature-focused games–those designed to develop informed attention in natural settings and those representing ecological themes, but playable more or less anywhere\u2014we\u2019re mostly focused on the latter.<\/p>\n

Asking myself what helps people connect with nature, I suddenly realized that\u2019s exactly what Friends, refuge staff and, indeed, refuges themselves do every day. Never mind for the moment what it means for people to think<\/em> themselves disconnected. What do refuges do to \u201crenew connections never entirely lost,\u201d as Aldo Leopold put it?<\/p>\n

In his 1933 text, Game Management, <\/em>Leopold pointed out that a refuge was \u201can integral part of a larger area,\u201d for which it performed various functions, starting with supporting the vitality, variety and sustainability of its wildlife resources. He understood early on that the \u201clarger area\u201d included the human community. For a refuge to nourish wildlife sustainably, it must also nourish the larger community\u2019s awareness of the values served.<\/p>\n

Of course it\u2019s the experience of nature itself that has the most immediate impact–land, sky, inspiring vistas, birds coming and going, mix of vegetation, wild energies in the air and ground, and endlessly surprising wildlife, all seemingly happening by itself. Look closer though, and it\u2019s not always so obvious where human worlds end and natural worlds begin. Clouds, storms, mountains and migrations may look like pure nature, along with that eagle on its snag. But humans have been busy here, too, planting crops, designing paths and ponds, even perhaps placing that snag, all with visitor experience in mind, so humans and birds alike may feel invited, nourished, at home, with a stake in that place.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m moved every time by the care taken to make our refuge so welcoming, informative and enjoyable for everyone, reflected in the warm greeting, variety of exhibits, hands-on play areas, observation posts and surrounding trails. Throw in an occasional children\u2019s chorus, jazz band, native flute, rehabilitated raptor, archery lesson, informative talk with slideshow, butterfly release–and boundaries disappear between art and nature, land and culture, learning and living. The shared good will that nourishes geese and cranes outside nourishes the person and community inside as well.<\/p>\n

Like ecology, game-making tends to be both individually creative and collaborative, involving a variety of arts. Ideally, the resulting play tunes into, reflects and evokes feeling for key aspects of the worlds represented, whether played alone or in a group. I\u2019m putting online some thoughts about more specific game possibilities and an invitation to collaborate, plus an overview of the territory and a \u201cThinking Like a Mountain\u201d experiment you can try with 15 pebbles.<\/p>\n

Eventually, we may add games from groups like the Leopold Education Project, though our focus remains on new designs that extend the play beyond natural settings. What might an \u201cEnchanted Flyway,\u201d \u201cRefuge Network,\u201d \u201cNature-Connect\u201d or even \u201cGame Management\u201d game end up being like? To help design, or explore game topics further, check out our new website at www.bodlibrary.net<\/a>.<\/p>\n

For more thoughts on play in nature, the functions served, and the human-nature relationship, check out the follow-up discussions below. Otherwise, for renewing your sense of connection with nature, check out a universe or refuge near you! You\u2019ll be thankful, too, for friends who appreciate both sides of our living community\u2014human and wild– enough to serve their mutual well-being with such good will.\u00a0[11\/7\/14]<\/p>\n

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<\/p>\n

Follow up 1 (Interplay 2):\u00a0<\/em><\/strong> Nature Connecting Games<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

For our purposes, there are two kinds of Nature Connection games (with\u00a0overlap). One kind uses game-play to enhance observation, exploration and discovery in nature. The other kind represents ecological themes, concepts and\/or dynamics for play outside of the natural setting.\u00a0Like photographs, poems, articles, paintings, and even place-inspired music, games can draw both content and inspiration\u00a0from an original source, then extend the connection beyond the single setting….<\/p>\n

[The rest of this discussion contains an\u00a0overview of\u00a0nature-connecting games and thoughts on particular experiments and possibilities….]<\/p>\n

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<\/p>\n

Follow-up 2<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0(Interplay 3)–A<\/em><\/strong> Shared Journey<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

[For more on the play between one &\u00a0many, \u00a0see “Seeds 16-After-play B–A Shared Journey.”]<\/p>\n

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\n<\/strong>[The following ran in the September issue 2014, in time for the annual Concert for the Birds.]
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Seeds of Thought (#15):<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0What the birds have to say\u2026<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Bird languages may be more varied even than ours. Whether announcing a territory, finding a food source, issuing an invitation, keeping in touch with others, sounding an alarm, improvising arias for the joy of it or just reporting on the state of the world from that branch-tip, voices are as recognizable to their flock-mates as human voices are to us. Composed of individuals with sometimes conflicting interests (as may be expressed in expletives of screech and squabble), a flock can also function as a single-minded entity with many neurons, eyes, ears, mouths and throats, connected partly by threads of sound.<\/p>\n

Attentive listeners, birds vocalize across an amazing range\u2014from heart-stopping meadowlark and operatic hermit thrush to the sheer brain power and mind-boggling imitations of magpie, mynah and macaw; from soft owl hoot to piercing hawk, reverberating kookaburra to echo-skipping loon; from cheerful chickadee, liquid warbler and amiably clear-toned grosbeak to the geese\u2019s gift-of-gab and the deep-throated conversations of cranes\u2014to cite a small sample, each in turn changing with context and circumstances.<\/p>\n

Bird language is not just oral, but also gestural and mimetic, conveyed by movement, as well as by sight and airflow-feel in flocks. Cues and inflections are directly expressive (as well as impressive) without distinctions between feeling, meaning, message, medium, or massage. Sight and sound circuits work seamlessly for us, too, even without actual sounds, as when \u201chearing\u201d thoughts inwardly while reading. Both birds and humans share a wide variety of communications using whatever voices and sense(s) we have at hand.<\/p>\n

With more distance folded up between intent and content, end and means, humans have more room for tactical deception, but birds have some ability to misdirect also, as when drawing attention away from a nest or sounding as if somewhere else to those without the right shift key. \u00a0(A domestic macaw I knew could call and scold the dog, bark back, and punctuate its performance with choice commentary, more of an artistic rendition of its sound-world than a deception\u2014except to the dog.) Birds aren\u2019t above misleading, teasing and playing tricks, but these aren\u2019t the norm, which usually involves vocalizing what\u2019s felt and feeling just what\u2019s said.<\/p>\n

That doesn\u2019t necessarily mean sweetness and light. Birds can let us know in no uncertain terms what they think of poor manners, some even as nestlings. In the wild, we adjust our distance and speed according to the range particular birds consider respectful for that situation, since the avian flight<\/em> response is so easily triggered by sudden movements from large, animated forms like ours–perhaps part of how \u2018flight\u2019 got off the ground, taking to the air, in the first place. If they hadn\u2019t had water and mud, frogs might have developed wings, too. The leap is so direct, sudden and compressed–not waiting around for translation.<\/p>\n

Despite the human capacity to speak tactically (and consequent reputation for having forked tongues), our language use is more often honest and direct, connecting individuals in a web of shared vibrations. Like the birds, we use it to exchange information and perspective, find and serve a common purpose, make music, and have fun. Being such a noisy species, however, exposure to the natural soundscape becomes especially valuable to us, re-tuning our instruments to what land and earth have to say–not just the birds, but the whole \u201cchildren\u2019s chorus\u201d of creation, though with special respect and admiration for the avian jazz all-stars!<\/p>\n

Our own arts benefit in the exchange, including decision-making and management, where listening to each voice informs the guidance for all. Musicians learn this principle in practice by playing together, at once listening and expressing, making and responding, giving and receiving. Friends find similar inspiration, reconnection and renewal enjoying land, birds, music and each other, gathering good will for each and all.<\/p>\n

[For more thoughts on \u201cMusic, noise & meaning,\u201d \u201cLiving in a flock,\u201d & \u201cWhat birds have to say,\u201d check below.]
\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<\/p>\n

Afterthoughts–more on above: <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Fight & flight: <\/em>Though many little darters rely mostly on speed, alertness, and agility, favoring flight over fight for survival, birds as a whole are far from fight-less,<\/em> whether with each other or with other species.\u00a0<\/em>Though rarely, e<\/em>ven\u00a0sociable parakeets can occasionally get into it with the ferocity of\u00a0fighting cocks, quite loudly.\u00a0Nestlings, if disturbed, sometimes go still & silent, but they can also\u00a0hiss, cackle\u00a0& rattle.<\/p>\n

Larger birds can really do some damage, &\/or hold their own, like crane with tiger in some martial arts. Nevertheless,\u00a0with a few notable exceptions (at least one flightless), unprovoked bird attacks on humans are rare. Most birds are too bright to make trouble over nothing, the same for most people–particularly\u00a0bird watchers, who tend to be good listeners.<\/p>\n

Inter-species communication: <\/em>A flock that recognizes who’s been feeding it, or a personable crow, may speak quite directly to us,\u00a0eliciting\u00a0an intended response. Corvids are just some of those who have shown they recognize individual humans. Parrots are notorious, of course, for learning to speak the languages of those nearby, including humans, although with\u00a0varying degrees of comprehension. [There’ll be more on this topic in “Living in a flock,” when it gets up below.]<\/p>\n

Language web: <\/em>Birds and humans aren\u2019t the only creatures with something to say to each other. Vocal communication\u00a0seems to be a broadly shared aspect of being alive, from crickets & frogs to porpoises & whales, coyotes & elephants. Never mind for now languages we hear only with sensitive instruments, given off by bats or plants, or written in scent-trails. Our inability to hear or read in a range doesn\u2019t mean nothing\u2019s going on there. Nor does it mean we don’t pick up some information\u00a0even so.<\/p>\n

The same may be said for languages we don’t\u00a0understand. In The American Rhythm, <\/em>Santa Fe poet Mary Austin claimed she could often tell\u00a0where recorded native songs\u00a0in languages she didn’t recognize had come from,\u00a0from how they reflected the\u00a0 rhythms of their land & its prevailing conditions. It’s\u00a0easier to pick up the emotional state of creature-generated\u00a0sound perceived directly, what’s expressed & what’s received, than other kinds of information.\u00a0Words aren’t\u00a0required, and effects can\u00a0be quite contrary to\u00a0verbal content, as in the cradle-crashing lyrics of the comforting lullaby, “Rock-a-bye Baby.”<\/p>\n

Despite widespread misconceptions to the contrary, neither languages nor\u00a0communication in general\u00a0require intent<\/em>. Language is ultimately\u00a0 another term for\u00a0medium or vehicle of (information) exchange. <\/em>On\u00a0a lower scale, we hardly know much\u00a0about the languages by which our own cells & organic systems communicate with each other,\u00a0let alone how they\u00a0converse with the rest of the world.<\/p>\n

It’s now known that\u00a0bacterial communicate with each other & with their environment as a whole, with a sense of things like population density, adjusting their own activities accordingly. Not just in a petri dish either, as “their people talk with our people” <\/em>on levels mostly beyond our awareness.\u00a0It doesn’t just take a village to keep us going, in other words, but a diverse & mixed ecology of sub-organisms.<\/p>\n

To be alive requires exchange with surroundings, as well as with others, on countless levels, many unconscious, others subliminal.\u00a0To be aware, on the other hand, requires \u00a0a fine tuning\u00a0where receiver & received\u00a0meet.<\/p>\n

Speaking of meeting, the 2014 Concert for the Birds is scheduled for Sept. 28, noon to 4, outdoors\u00a0at the Las Vegas National Wildlife Refuge Visitor’s Center, featuring a children’s chorus, a jazz quartet & the usual suspects. One can easily see how las vegas<\/em> got\u00a0its name, not just where the mountain meet the plains (& sometimes vice versa), but where the human & wild converse.<\/p>\n

Here are a few more snapshots from earlier concerts, starting with one of George ‘Deer Tracks’ Tyler playing two nose-flutes at once at the very first of these now annual gatherings.<\/p>\n

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<\/p>\n

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[The following Seeds…are currently being updated, including re-insertion of photos. They should be easier to read shortly.] Seeds of\u00a0Thought (#21):\u00a0All of the above–& then some Seeds of\u00a0Thought (#20):\u00a0The Trans-local Mind in Migration Seeds of Thought (#19): Thinking like a planet Seeds of Thought (#18):\u00a0A Net with Many Moving Centers   Seeds of Thought (#21)—All of … Continue reading “Seeds Archive 21-15”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":45,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-67","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":274,"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/67\/revisions\/274"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/45"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eco-wing.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}